God's Law vs Human Law in Great
Expectations
In his book Great Expectations, the
problematic nature of moral judgement and justice that stems from a
conflict between God's law and human law is one of several topical
themes that Charles Dickens addresses. This paradox regularly surfaces
in his treatment of plot and setting, and is more subtlety illustrated
in his use of character. To facilitate the reader's awareness of such a
conflict, the narrator often uses language that has Christian
connotations when relating his thoughts and when giving descriptions of
the environment, characters and events that take place. While these
things allude to divine and moral law, the story itself revolves around
crime and criminals, thereby bringing issues of human law into focus.
The climate for this theme is established from the very beginning of the
novel. Pip's act of Christian charity towards the convict can also be
considered a serious crime. The story opens in a churchyard where the
grave, symbolic of eternal judgement can be contrasted with the nearby
gallows, symbolizing human punishment. Set on the eve in which we
commemorate the birth of Christianity, an institution based on charity
and love, Pip feels guilty for bringing food to a starving fellow human.
Pip must steal food from his own family to help Magwitch, thereby
transforming mercy and compassion into crimes. As Pip is running home,
he looks back at the convict and sees him limping towards the gallows
"...as if he were the pirate come to life, and come down, and going back
up again" (27). This imagery conveys a complicated perception of guilt
as something conscious of its own moral accountability, frightening and
self-destructive. When Magwitch is caught, he gives a false confession
to stealing the food from the Gargery's to protect Pip. Joe replies that he wouldn't want him to
starve and that he was welcome to it. Pip highlights the conflict
between divine and human law by comparing the Hulk that his convict is
returned to as "a wicked Noah's ark" (56). Thus in these first few
chapters, the ideals of justice, mercy, law, and punishment are
intermingled and confused.
This confusion is furthered by Mrs. Joe, who actually transforms charity
into punishment. Her beatings, bullying and lectures of how she brought
Pip up "by hand" at great personal sacrifice are a constant reminder to
Pip of his fault for ever being born. The narrator recounts his sisters
response to Mrs. Hubble's observation that young Pip has been a "world
of trouble" and we see that Pip is made to feel guilty even for things
completely beyond his control as a young and innocent child:
"Trouble?" echoed my sister; "trouble?" And then entered on a fearful
catalogue of all the illnesses I had been guilty of, and all the acts of
sleeplessness I had committed, and all the high place I had tumbled
from, and all the low places I had tumbled into, and all the injuries I
had done myself, and all the times she had wished me in my grave, and I
had contumaciously refused to go there. (45)
Pip becomes familiar with guilt and injustice at a very young age, and
these issues become central to his motivations throughout his life as a
young man. Ironically it is Orlick, the most contemptible character in
the novel who is Mrs. Joe's unwitting agent of justice. Orlick, who
embodies selfishness and violence, is never brought to justice for his
murderous behavior.
Magwitch is another example of a failed justice system. Superficially,
he appears to personify evil and moral corruption. Pip finds him
horrifying upon their first encounter and equally revolting when he
returns to London as Provis. Despite all this, we learn that he is a
loving, generous, sympathetic man who risks his life to see Pip and
spends his fortune to repay Pip for an act of kindness. While he is a
criminal, and deserving of punishment from the law, he is simultaneously
deserving of mercy and forgiveness from God. Compeyson, is treated much
more favorably by the law than Magwitch: "And when the verdict come,
warn't it Compeyson as was recommended to mercy on account of good
character and bad company, and giving up all the information he could
agen me, and warn't it me as got never a word but Guilty?" (324).
Compeyson exhibits no redeeming qualities at all, but it is Magwitch who
gets the tougher sentence. Though Magwitch's fate seems inconsistent
with his kind and unselfish behavior, it is
in perfect alignment with the theme under consideration. The interplay
between divine and human justice is again alluded to at the convict's
final court appearance when he says to the Judge "My Lord, I have
received my sentence of Death from the Almighty, but I bow to yours"
(272).
One can draw from the narrator's own self-revelations as well. In
preparation for his first visit to Satis House, Pip recalls how he
"...was put into clean linen of the stiffestcharacter, like a young
penitent into sackcloth, and was trussed up in my tightest and
fearfullest suit [and] delivered to Mr. Pumblechook, who formally
received me as if he were the Sheriff " (67). Just two paragraphs later,
Pip observes the many little drawers of Mr. Pumblechook's seed shop. As
he peeks into the drawers and sees the seeds tied up in brown paper
packets he wonders "...whether the flower-seeds and bulbs ever wanted of
a fine day to break out of those jails, and bloom" (67). Given that
"pip" is also the word for a small seed, one cannot help but draw a
parallel here. When he returns from the Satis House, he tells outrageous
lies about his experience there, and admits this to Joe later. In one
short episode, Pip has described himself as a penitent, a prisoner, and
a confessed wrongdoer.
The conflict between Pip's own instincts regarding morality and
conventional perceptions of justice and punishment is manifested as the
guilt he is burdened with throughout his childhood and young adult life.
Pip accumulates these feelings and attempts to suppress them throughout
most of the story. At one point the narrator takes a moment to reflect
on his guilty conscience:
As I had grown accustomed to my expectations, I had insensibly begun to
notice their effect upon myself and those around me. Their influence on
my own character, I disguised from my recognition as much as possible,
but I knew very well that it was not all good. I lived in a state of
chronic uneasiness respecting my behaviour to Joe. My conscience was not
by any means comfortable about Biddy. (256)
He goes into great debt in his attempts to distract himself from this
guilt, and drags his dear friend Herbert along with him (which he also
expresses guilt about). His vain attempt to make reparations with his
conscience by sending "a penitential codfish and a barrel of oysters .
BACK TO DIRECTORY |
BACK TO SUB
DIRECTORY: CHARLES DICKENS
BACK
TO MAIN