
Free
Term papers Directory BACK
TO MAIN
Disclaimer: Term papers are for research purposes only.
Critical Essay on Billy Budd
Charles Reich's assessment of the conflict in Billy Budd focuses on the
distinction between the laws of society and the laws of nature. Human
law says that men are "the sum total of their actions, and no more."
Reich uses this as a basis for his assertion that Billy is innocent in
what he is, not what he does. The point of the novel is therefore not to
analyze the good and evil in Billy or Claggart, but to put the reader in
the position of Captain Vere, who must interpret the laws of both man
and nature.
Reich supports Vere's decision to hang Billy. In defense of this he
alludes to a famous English court case, in which three men were accused
of murder. However, the circumstances which led them to murder were
beyond their control; they had been stranded at sea and forced to kill
and eat their fourth companion, who had fallen ill and was about to die
anyway. The Judge, Lord Coleridge, found them guilty because "law cannot
follow nature's principle of self-preservation." In other words,
necessity is not a justification for killing, even when this necessity
is beyond human control. Since Billy is unable to defend himself
verbally, he "responds to pure nature, and the dictates of necessity" by
lashing out at Claggart. I agree with Reich's notion that Vere was
correct in hanging Billy, and that it is society, not Vere, who should
be criticized for this judgement; for Vere is forced to reject the
urgings of his own heart and his values to comply with the binding laws
of man.
First, the moral issue aside, Captain Vere had no choice but to convict
Billy. As captain of a ship under pressure of war and the constant
threat of mutiny, Vere had to act swiftly. Also, as captain, Vere had
the responsibility of making sure the laws were strictly enforced,
including the Mutiny Act. Although Vere knew in his heart Billy was
innocent, Billy's actions had to be punished.
For Vere to have acquitted Billy would mean that he had placed the
divine law of nature above the laws he was bound to enforce as captain
of a British ship. Although this would have been morally right, who is
to say where to draw the line? This rhetorical question is what Melville
wants his readers to think about. Melville could have easily written in
the plot that Vere went along with the captain's suggestion to call
witnesses. With the testimonies of Dansker, the afterguardsman, and
Squeak, Billy could have been cleared of the mutiny charge. But I agree
with Reich that Melville wanted to use Billy as an example of the flaws
in the laws of society; that they do not take into account the laws of
nature. However, until we reform our laws in such a way that we cannot
be punished for something out of our control, we cannot expect the laws
to be interpreted that way.
Charles A. Reich, "The Tragedy of Justice in Billy Budd," Critical
Essays on Melville's Billy Budd, Sailor, pp. 127-143
BACK TO DIRECTORY |
BACK TO SUB DIRECTORY:
ENGLISH

Did
you find term papers you were looking for:
If
you find some thing useful in return contribute some of your own term
papers. All these Term papers are plagiarized as it is on free for all
basis. These term papers are never sold by Ghost Papers.
All
Term papers in the directory above are submitted by students.


Didn't
find term papers you were looking for:
With a team of experienced writers and excellent researchers to
back them up, we guarantee to match your needs, for all subjects
and topics. Expert Term paper Service beyond expectations is our
distinguishing factor.
Term
papers at GPA are 99.99% custom written
We
handle our orders very seriously because a minor problem in your term
papers could turn your academic career upside down, which cannot be repaid
with either a refund or a free term paper. Therefore, we never accept
term papers which we cannot write or deliver on time.
Our
term papers can help you
obtain excellent grades. We hire only professional writers from
respective fields of expertise.
BACK
TO MAIN